|
|
How we change what others think, feel, believe and do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Models of Relating
Explanations > Relationships > Four Models of Relating Communal sharing | Authority ranking | Equality matching | Market pricing | So what?
Fiske and Haslam (1996) identified four common patterns of relating. Each model is distinct in the rules and values of how the people interact. Communal sharingSome relationship are defined by how people live together in a trusting relationship whereby they share many things, considering them as 'ours' rather than 'mine'. Fairness is important in such groups and conflict may be dealt with through mediation and others methods that seek agreement from all. ExampleRomantic couples, Kin groups Authority rankingThe social groups and organizations in which we live are often arranged with a hierarchy of power. It starts with parent and child and then progresses to schools, workplaces and other groupings. Whilst communal sharing groups are based on trust and fair play, authority relationships are based on command and control where the inferior person has little option but to obey the superior person. ExampleTeacher and pupil, Officer and soldier Equality matchingIn equality relationships there is no authority between people nor is there the deeper responsibility towards one another as in the communal sharing model. Equality matched relationships generally collaborate around shared goals and help one another on the basis of a loose exchange of favors. ExampleWork peers, Sports team mates Market pricingIn the market pricing model, the relationship is based around a transaction, where the parties exchange substantive items, often with money being a part of the transaction. Such relationships may be shorter than others and more formal, even with an explicit or implied contract to formalize the exchange. ExampleBuyer and seller, landlord and tenant So what?Identify the relationship model that the other person is using and beware of using another model unless you deliberately want to cause confusion. Otherwise use the rules and values of the model that the other person is using. See also
Fiske, A.P. and Haslam, N. (1996). Social Cognition Is Thinking About Relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 143–148
|
|
|
— Contact — Caveat — About — Students — Webmasters — Awards — Guestbook — Feedback — Sitemap — Changes — |
|
|
|
.