Changing
Minds
.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Guestbook

 

Links

 

 

Now, you can buy
the real book!

Add/share/save
this page:

Add to Google

 

 


Save the rain


 

 

 

Mehrabian's communication study

 

Explanations > Behaviors > Understanding body language > Mehrabian's communication study

 

There is an oft-quoted (and often mis-quoted) study by Albert Mehrabian on how people decide whether they like one another.

The studies

Mehrabian and his colleagues were seeking to understand the relative impact of facial expressions and spoken words.

Study 1

Subjects were asked to listen to a recording of a female saying the single word 'maybe' in three tones of voice to convey liking, neutrality and disliking.

The subjects were then shown photos of female faces with the same three emotions and were asked to guess the emotions in the recorded voices, the photos and both in combination.

The photos got more accurate responses than the voice, by a ratio of 3:2.

Study 2

Subjects listened to nine recorded words, three conveying liking (honey, dear and thanks), three conveying neutrality (maybe, really and oh) and three conveying disliking (don’t, brute and terrible).

The words were spoken with different tonalities and subjects were asked to guess the emotions behind the words as spoken. The experiment finding was that tone carried more meaning than the individual words themselves.

The misunderstanding

Mehrabian concluded the following formula from these studies:

 

Total Liking = 7% Verbal Liking + 38% Vocal Liking + 55% Facial Liking

 

This is subsequently generalized to mean that in all communications:

  • 7% happens in spoken words.
  • 38% happens through voice tone.
  • 55% happens via general body language.

Of course this cannot be true: does an email only convey 7%? Can you watch a person speaking in a foreign language and understand 93%?

The implications

Whilst the exact numbers may be challenged, the important points can easily be lost in the debate about how valid or not the study was.

Useful extensions to this understanding are:

  • It's not just words: a lot is communication comes through non-verbal communication.
  • Without seeing and hearing non-verbals, it is easier to misunderstand the words.
  • When we are unsure about words and when we trust the other person less, we pay more attention to what we hear and see.

So what?

Beware of words-only communications like email. It is very easy to misunderstand what is said, even if emoticons (smileys) are used.

When you feel that a person is not telling the truth, check out the alignment between words, voice and body.

See also

Using Body Language

Mehrabian's site is at: http://www.kaaj.com/psych/

Mehrabian, Albert, and Ferris, Susan R. “Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 3, June 1967, pp. 248-258

Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages, Wadsworth, California: Belmont

Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton, Illinois: Chicago

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

  © Syque 2002-2009

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed