changingminds.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Help us

 

Links

 

 

 

Non-Specific Hypothesis

 

Disciplines > Counselling > Non-Specific Hypothesis

Description | Discussion | See also

 

Description

The non-specific hypothesis suggests that a significant contribution to the success of any specific therapeutic method comes from a range of factors that are common to all approaches.

Discussion

Whilst there are many different schools of thought and disciplinary approaches to counseling and therapy, studies of effectiveness generally show a similar rate of success.

Grencavage and Norcross (1990) found four broad cateories of non-specific factors:

  1. Client characteristics
  2. Therapist qualities
  3. Change processes
  4. Treatment methods

In reviewing professional opinion, they found greatest agreement on:

  • The therapeutic alliance (56%)
  • The opportunity for catharsis (38%)
  • Acquisition and practice of new behaviors (32%)
  • Positive client expectations (26%)
  • Therapist qualities (24%)
  • Provision of rationale (24%)

Llewellyn and Hume (1979) surveyed clients and found that they also rated non-specific factors as most significant in their success.

See also

Counseling Success Factors

 

Grencavage, L.M. and Norcross, J.C. (1990). What are the commonalities among the therapeutic factors? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 372-378.

Llewelyn, F. and Hume, W. (1979). Patient's view of therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 52, 29–35.

 

 

And the big
paperback book


Add/share/save:


 

 


Save the rain


 

 


SalesProCentral

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

  © Changing Minds 2002-2012

  Massive Content -- Maximum Speed

TOP