Changing
Minds
.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Guestbook

 

Links

 

 

Now, you can buy
the real book!

Add/share/save
this page:

Add to Google

 

 


Save the rain


 

 

 

Modus Tollens

 

Disciplines Argument > Syllogisms > Modus Tollens

Description | Example | Discussion | See also

 

Description

If X is true then Y is true.

Y is false.

Therefore X is false.

Example

If there is smoke, there is fire. There is not fire, so there is no smoke.

If I am happy, then I smile. I am not smiling, therefore I am not happy.

Discussion

Modus Tollens is not as straightforward as its companion, Modus Ponens. Although common in argument, a Modus Tollens is not necessarily true, as the major premise (If X is true then Y is true) says nothing about falsehood. If, however, X and Y are bivalent (both can be either true or false) and X can only be true if Y is true, then the Modus Tollens stands.

Modus Tollens is the root of falsification, as proposed by Karl Popper and since used as the cornerstone of scientific proof.

This is also known as Denying the Consequent, as Y, the consequent is being denied as being true.

See also

Conditional Reasoning, Denying the Antecedent, Affirming the Consequent, Modus Ponens

 

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

  © Syque 2002-2009

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed