ChangingMinds Web 

         

Home

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

Blog!

Quotes

Guest articles

Analysis

Book Reviews

Bookshop

Links

Caveat

Changes

Students!

Webmasters!

Contact

About

Guestbook

Site Map

Share this page:

Add to Google

 

 

Books and
more at:

USA:

In association with amazon.com

UK:

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

Canada:

In Association with amazon.ca

 

 

Undistributed Middle

 

Disciplines Argument > Fallacies > Undistributed Middle

Description | Discussion | Example | See also

 

Description

All A is B. All C is B. Therefore all C is A.

B is assumed to cover all items in its category.

Example

All Californians are beautiful. All women are beautiful. Therefore all women are Californian.

All fools act stupid. You acted stupid. Therefore you are a fool.

All elephants are big. Some boys are big. Therefore some boys are elephants.

Discussion

The problem here is that the middle term (that connects the first two statements) is assumed to refer to the same thing -- typically all of the members in its category, yet this is seldom true. Thus, in the first example above, neither all Californians nor all women cover all of the beautiful people in the world (some British men are beautiful).

In effect, the 'reasonable' assumption is that the first two statements are of the form A=B and C=B, from which the mathematically sound conclusion is that C=A. Unfortunately, syllogisms deal with sets, not mathematical variables.

Classification

Assumptive, Syllogistic

See also

 

 


 

  © Syque 2002-2008

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed